Renting Music Is Costing Your Brand. Here’s What Owning It Looks Like

Two sonic branding veterans break down why agencies need to stop borrowing other people's equity

Danielle Venne, Executive Creative Director at Made Music Studio, has spent close to 20 years helping brands like AT&T, Corona and Frito-Lay figure out what they should sound like. Eric Singer, Partner and Creative Director at Coupe Studios Music + Sound Design, has been doing the same from Boulder, Colorado for 17 yearsโ€”building sonic brands, branded podcasts and audio for healthcare, UX and film.

Together, they make the case that most brands are renting when they should be buyingโ€”and that independent agencies are positioned to lead the shift.

The gap between โ€œimportantโ€ and โ€œafterthoughtโ€

Watch this section: 9:03

Ask anyone at an agency how important music is to a campaign and the answer is almost always the same: critical. But the process tells a different story.

Venne points to the difference between campaign thinking and brand building. โ€œIf youโ€™re thinking campaign mode, youโ€™re thinking 13 weeks,โ€ she says. โ€œBrand building needs a longer vision. Whether you spend $100 or a million dollars, the question is the sameโ€”what are you building? Is it going to last?โ€

Singer puts the disconnect more bluntly: everybody has an opinion about music, but those opinions rarely connect to strategy. โ€œThe average consumer doesnโ€™t have an opinion on color correction, but everybodyโ€™s got an opinion about music. A lot of times, these decisions are made based on somebodyโ€™s taste without any strategic thought behind it.โ€

Renting versus owning your sound

Watch this section: 16:36

Singer frames the cost with a metaphor that lands. โ€œEvery time you create a spot and license a piece of music, itโ€™s like renting an Airbnb mansion to throw a great party one weekend,โ€ he says. โ€œMaybe you impress some people, but you donโ€™t own that house.โ€

Contrast that with investing in ownable sonic assetsโ€”a mnemonic, a branded sound suite, an audio identity systemโ€”and the math starts to change.

Venne agrees. โ€œYouโ€™re borrowing somebody elseโ€™s equity and then you kind of have to give it back.โ€ She compares it to the Nike swoosh: impossible to put an exact number on its value, but impossible to argue it isnโ€™t worth something enormous.

Every time a brand puts content into the world without thinking strategically about its sound, itโ€™s missing an opportunity to build that same kind of equityโ€”through ears instead of eyes.

What youโ€™re upselling is speed to emotion

Watch this section: 15:04

Singer offers a reframe agencies should steal: when youโ€™re selling sonic branding to a client, youโ€™re selling speed.

โ€œWe hear sound 10 times faster than we can process visuals,โ€ he says. โ€œIt bypasses the conscious part of our brain. What youโ€™re upselling is speed to emotion and speed to decision.โ€

He points to Immersion Neuroscience, which measures dopamine and oxytocin responses to branded content through smartwatch biometricsโ€”a way to quantify what gut instinct has always known.

Venne builds on this with a practical framework for getting sound decisions approved: good creative, good data and a good story. โ€œIf you donโ€™t have those three things,โ€ she says, โ€œthen itโ€™s the loudest person in the room.โ€

Why indies have the advantage

Watch this section: 23:00

Independent agencies are positioned to lead in sonic branding for the same reasons they win in other areas: speed, intimacy and fewer layers.

โ€œYouโ€™ve got more permission to color outside the lines,โ€ Venne says. โ€œYou can sense and adapt to client needs quicker.โ€

Singer takes it further. โ€œIndies tend to know their clients better, and so much of the hard cost of developing sonic brand assets is tied up in the back and forth and endless revisions. You donโ€™t have to have 12 people from the agency on every call.โ€

For agencies that want to start small, both guests suggest beginning with a single ownable asset tied to the highest-value or highest-repetition touchpoint. From there, the value proves itself. โ€œBefore that one year is even up, theyโ€™re going to recognize the value,โ€ Singer says.

Give nostalgia a break

Watch this section: 26:03

When asked what brands should stop doing with sound immediately, Venne doesnโ€™t hesitate. โ€œGive nostalgia a break. Weโ€™re running out of past. Just be present.โ€

Singer agreesโ€”and adds the opposite end of the spectrum. โ€œChasing trends and developing music in K-pop style might be super cool this year. Itโ€™s probably not a great look a couple years from now.โ€

The takeaway for agencies: build something that belongs to the brand. Not something borrowed from the past and not something chasing the present. Something owned, strategic and designed to compound in valueโ€”just through a different sense.


Learn more

Made Music Studio
Coupe Studios Music + Sound Design
Danielle Venne LinkedIn
Eric Singer LinkedIn
Made Music Studio LinkedIn
Coupe Studios LinkedIn
Contact: in**@*************io.com | in**@**********os.com | (303) 447-0551

Share your love